这不是一部适合消闲娱乐的电影。一切场景仿佛发生在话剧的舞台上，只有打下的灯光、简单的布景和道具。许多演员都穿着色彩鲜艳夸张的衣服、化着只有舞台剧才化的那么浓的妆。比起一部电影来，它还更像许多话剧场景的串连。它甚至不能说像个传统的话剧，许多场景夹带了干巴巴的哲学讨论，另一些则极其平淡，仿佛不过是个情节过渡，那些看来可算在讲故事的片断则当真尽职尽责，它们把一个简单的故事讲清楚了——如此而已。无论哪一种，背景都是黑沉沉的，灯光往往只照亮了人物的半边脸，于是这些场景如同一些从鲜亮的世界中切下来的小碎屑。
“the world is everything that is the case”那个扮演少年维特根斯坦的小男孩扛着一面如此写道的蓝色大旗走过。我承认我看不懂这句话。字幕则说：“实际上，世界就是由这些发生过的事构成的。”
我之前一直煞费苦心，想找出点哲学意义而无果，到了这里才忽然精神一振。
实际上，世界就是由这些发生过的事构成的。对于我们来说，所谓地球围着太阳转，或太阳围着地球转，是怎样被看见的？他的学生说他明白了
Considered by some to be the greatest philosopher of the 20th century, Ludwig Wittgenstein played a central, if controversial, role in 20th-century analytic philosophy. He continues to influence current philosophical thought in topics as diverse as logic and language, perception and intention, ethics and religion, aesthetics and culture. Originally, there were two commonly recognized stages of Wittgenstein's thought—the early and the later—both of which were taken to be pivotal in their respective periods. In more recent scholarship, this division has been questioned: some interpreters have claimed a unity between all stages of his thought, while others talk of a more nuanced division, adding stages such as the middle Wittgenstein and the third Wittgenstein. Still, it is commonly acknowledged that the early Wittgenstein is epitomized in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. By showin
写标题真的是一个很头疼的事，就像片中说的，试图用一个名词去概括所有事情。哪有那么多权威。个人随想，个人日记贴切很多。
看的第一部Jerman的电影，还不熟悉他的风格，但片中复杂的对话太多，特别是当整个影片的叙事框架和发展方向都设定在了以哲学式对答的形式中时，我很疑惑，图片和电影的意义对于Jerman来说到底是什么？
电影大致的存在意义依托于结尾，犹如片中所说，活着的意义依托于死亡。但电影作为现实生活的镜子，记录和存在只是其最基本的作用
维特根斯坦：一切有为法，当作如是观
转载请注明网址: https://www.cdxrwl.com/dy/id-44795.html
